I ponder In case the wording was intentional or should they merely intended to declare that buildings with enclosed mezzanines meeting XXX parameters are required to have two exits. The only scenario I have study the place it wasn't upheld was when a person was clearly trying to use interjurisdictional https://manual-lifting-equipment04678.blue-blogs.com/46191757/not-known-factual-statements-about-pallet-gate