The courtroom dominated that when multiple functions have equivalent pre-emption rights, the property must be divided Similarly amid them. This ensures a fair distribution of property between co-sharers with equivalent authorized standings. The courtroom held that any transaction involving communal land with no approval of other co-sharers is void. This https://franciscoabffy.mpeblog.com/55225105/an-unbiased-view-of-leasehold-and-tenancy-lawyer-in-karachi